Justin Webb presents Radio iv's Today program and was previously the BBC's North America Editor

July 30, 2020

July 30, 2020

Filed under:

What if America rejects Trump but cannot notice a new manner to alive: a new direction, a balm, a grade of healing? There are some conventional reasons to fearfulness American carnage, to apply the president'south memorable inauguration oral communication phrase. If the United States unravels — if the Left is every bit incapable of re-establishing solidarity as Donald Trump has been — then it is not going to exist sending aircraft carriers to sort out the Straits of Hormuz or to police the South China Bounding main. Someone else might accept to — or no-i — a rebalancing of world power that won't make us any freer.

But that'due south not the biggest trouble for the rest of us, and nor is the loss of American soft ability. Hollywood tin can wither abroad or (likelier) get lost in its own fundament. We would survive. The states universities might boss international league tables but hey, Oxford and London, not Harvard and Yale, are bringing usa (permit'due south pray) coronavirus vaccines.

No: the reason America dysfunction matters is less tangible only psychologically and then much more than powerful: the U.s.a. is owned past all of us in what we might roughly term the complimentary world. We are of it. It is of us. The experiment in self-government that America (imperfectly) represents seems somehow vital to all our futures because we are invested in it — we accept feelings for it, and feelings against it.

Some honey it and some loathe information technology, just more importantly: billions of people effectually the globe do both. When it comes to America almost no-one is uninterested. We are involved. Only information technology's equally true, in the George Floyd era, that nigh no-i is an out-and-out fan. We feel invested in the project because the project is then huge and boisterous and naïve and inspiring and yet sickeningly flawed at the same time.

When the flaws come to the fore you lot don't take to exist a psychotherapist to see how our reactions might be affected by our disgust at ourselves — phone call it Netflix angst. We wish we had non been so keen on the damned place and nosotros want to atone. We should not take loved the Beachboys, or Obama, or been then bullheaded to the horrors of racism and endemic poverty.

As the German publisher and academic Joseph Joffe in one case wrote of the causes of anti-Americanism, "Seduction is worse than imposition. It makes you feel weak, and then y'all hate the soft-pawed corrupter, likewise equally yourself."

Then the question arises, equally Trump teeters and the world watches repulsed and attracted in equal measure: what kind of a nation is America? Actually is. Not should be or would be or was: just is. If you opened up the hood, as my American-schooled children would say, what would you find?

Well, most Americans are socialists, at least according to a book out next calendar month — a book not as batty as that sentence makes it seem. The central argument ofEvil Geniuses, by the journalist Kurt Andersen, is that past the standard definitions used by Republicans to describe socialism – that's where nearly folks on main street really are.

They want more than regulation of Wall St. They want a wealth tax. They think corporations should pay more as well. And in a large change — a sea alter since the days of Reagan — most call up that "circumstances beyond their control cause people to be poor". When shown the slogan "Communism is American power plus electrification," near Americans swoon.

Oh alright, I fabricated upwardly the last ane. But the view of poverty is middle-catching (it's from a regular survey conducted by the conservative American Enterprise Institute) and even more so when added to a Gallup poll in 2018 that found a solid majority wanted to reduce inequality.

I had always idea that inequality was of no interest at all to virtually Americans. I hoped so too,  for mainly anthropological reasons: information technology made them more interesting. Just I may be wrong, and maybe they are, in fact, every bit wearisome as usa.

"America today is non a center-right country," the Princeton sociologist Paul Starr wrote in 2018, just rather "a land with a center-right economical elite" that dominates. Throw off the influence of that elite — Kurt Andersen'south eponymous Evil Geniuses — and the nation would become, well, what it was in the good old days before they had control.

I am non and then sure.

There is a Left — a roughly social democratic Left — in America: of that there is no doubtfulness. Andersen writes eloquently of labour unions and social solidarity among working people, ironically a solidarity whose apogee was reached under Nixon in the early 1970s. The Nixon who built on rather than challenging FDR's New Deal, and who was happy to spend on social programmes. Nixon was not himself a liberal, of course, but every bit Andersen writes, he was "a canny rock-cold cynic going along with the liberal flow".

Then the flow stopped. Those Evil Geniuses hijacked the nation and the rest is history. Andersen (and many others on the American Left including Joe Biden) advise that the re-finding of social democracy is a affair of returning habitation to normality.

There is one trouble, however.

Let u.s.a. presume for a moment that Donald Trump loses in November and the Republican Party spends some time licking its wounds, out of power not but in the White House only in Congress also. What do the Democrats desire to do with America?  Do they embrace the Andersen retro programme?

What if they do non? What if the new American Left is — equally the philosopher Richard Rorty put it, exhausted? Rorty thought that the old social democratic American Left "complanate during the late sixties nether the burden of the conflagration surrounding the Vietnam War" and was replaced by one that thought the only style forwards was a "complete dismantling of the 'arrangement'".

The opening sentence of Rorty'south magisterial Achieving Our Country, published back in 1998, reads "National pride is to countries what self-respect is to individuals, a necessary condition for cocky-improvement."

And, he argued, national pride in America is but what the American left had lost — and if that was truthful in 1998 it is true with knobs on in 2020: to quote the great philosopher, "a spectatorial, disgusted, mocking Left" understands the nation in a way that "leads them to step dorsum from their country and, as they say, 'theorize' information technology. It leads them to … requite cultural politics preference over real politics, and to mock the very idea that democratic institutions might once once again exist made to serve social justice."

Rorty, who died in 2007, was not an consummate enemy of the new Left's keenness on race and gender — he idea they had a bespeak — merely he knew that it would end in tears. He knew that identity politics would ditch the uncomfortable, sweaty-smelling folks in the unions, the welders and electricians and carpenters and that those (mainly white) men would in plough ditch the Democrats. And so information technology came to laissez passer, and at present we might be post-Rorty with no route dorsum.

Does the American Left have what it takes to knit together the nation when its mod iteration so clearly dislikes so much nearly it? Later on the statues ,what else must fall? What other horrors must be uncovered? The jury is out, to put it mildly, on whether American atonement might be over soon or just beginning. If the question is betwixt social solidarity or connected struggle, plenty of modern Democrats have had it with the former and are willing to embrace the latter.

They may or may not exist right, or justified, but if America finds no comfort and no direction we will all suffer the consequences.   There'south a lot riding on the Biden presidency, if it comes. For them, and, as ever, for us.